photo: Ralf Vandermeulen |
My
biggest complaint about Hamilton’s Supercrawl is strangely enough also my
biggest compliment. It goes like this: I don’t ever get to enjoy the headline
events 'cos I get sucked into a haze, wandering with no intention, talking
to a zillion people, getting distracted by a myriad of tiny moments.
In
fact, every year I grow a little more convinced that there are actually two
events going on, one that features rock and noise and fire and bombastically
complicated food, and the other that just features people absorbed in multiple
acts of subtle communion. But the two events
somehow need each other. The spectacle
and chaos somehow allow the tinier moments to occur without them getting too
precious. If there wasn’t a constant
throbbing din, it would be just a bunch of people standing around telling each
other how much they love each other, and that would feel weird.
Conversely,
the communal spirit humanizes Supercrawl in a way that doesn’t often happen
with festivals of that scale. I mean yeah, the GreenBelt Harvest Picnic is communal and beautiful, but it is also a more sedate setting, a more homogeneous
group of people, a single tribe who agree on a rootsy backbeat
in both their music and their food. So it makes sense.
Supercrawl is bigger, more urban, more diverse, with no single point of focus, and worst of all, it generates these nerve-wrackingly tight throngs of shoulder to shoulder people. Supercrawl has the bad paintings, the super-precious busker-singers, and hucksters who sell magical pieces of fuzzy crap on an invisible string that your children will lust over and never ever get to work. It has the guy with drill and the potato and the deep fryer who makes some kind of twisty soggy french fry pinwheel abomination. So much to panic and fume over, yet the pervasive neighbourliness is never shaken.
And that neighbourliness gives you the will to root out those moments of craft and polish that count: Rudi's boutique popsicles, or the zippy screen prints of the Jelly Brothers, the fashion of Vespidame or Blackbird, or the ragtime washboard zeal of the Vaudvillian, holding their crowd without a stage.
photo: Jeff Tessier |
Supercrawl is bigger, more urban, more diverse, with no single point of focus, and worst of all, it generates these nerve-wrackingly tight throngs of shoulder to shoulder people. Supercrawl has the bad paintings, the super-precious busker-singers, and hucksters who sell magical pieces of fuzzy crap on an invisible string that your children will lust over and never ever get to work. It has the guy with drill and the potato and the deep fryer who makes some kind of twisty soggy french fry pinwheel abomination. So much to panic and fume over, yet the pervasive neighbourliness is never shaken.
And that neighbourliness gives you the will to root out those moments of craft and polish that count: Rudi's boutique popsicles, or the zippy screen prints of the Jelly Brothers, the fashion of Vespidame or Blackbird, or the ragtime washboard zeal of the Vaudvillian, holding their crowd without a stage.
The
opening gesture of my 2014 Supercrawl experience was my ten year old son prostrating
himself to kissed the road. “That’s what
I’m talking about’, he says. And this is
what’s great about kids, is that they don’t put their pleasures in a
hierarchy. Getting to walk down the
centre of the street was as palpable a thrill as Circus Danger, or whatever they
were called (I didn’t get to see them because I was chatting). My other son went into a twenty minute epiphany because someone had propped a bubble machine in a second story window.
For
seven hours on Saturday, I had the pleasure to be the MC at the Supercrawl
fashion stage. It initially felt awkward –I have virtually no
relationship to fashion---but then became nearly sublime. The stage set up was relatively humble, and
at full tilt could only service a crowd of maybe two hundred people. And yeah, you had to pump out thumpy rock or
disco music to make it work, yeah I had to yell like a tent preacher, but only to initiate a fairly intimate ritual
of people just carefully looking, appreciating these details and tiny flourishes
that can make clothes and people so interesting.
And
speaking of interesting clothes, twice over the weekend I put on one of Andrew
McPhail’s anxiety t-shirts (he bedazzled the word of a number of personal
fears—'moron', 'cad', 'twat', 'wimp', etc.—and loaned the shirts out for the weekend). I liked this project because it obligated you
to be a disseminator of McPhail’s premise; it became something you had to
explain to people in your own words. And
his premise was precisely the opposite of the ‘plop and drop’ works that vie for attention by concentrating themselves into a single declaration. McPhail succeeded through dispersal, a
thousand disjointed messages wandering every which way.
photo: Andrew McPhail |
And if we didn't catch sight of that tiny crappy carboard sign outside the church, we would have missed it.